Learn More

40 Hour Workweek

Classroom Management, Teaching Tips & Tricks   |   Oct 29, 2015

An alternative to differentiated math centers that’s easier, faster, AND more effective

By Angela Watson

Founder and Writer

An alternative to differentiated math centers that’s easier, faster, AND more effective

By Angela Watson

Math centers or workstations where kids are all involved in different activities are a fundamental part of many elementary classrooms.

But centers are also a tremendous amount of work for the teacher, as both differentiation and assessment can be time-consuming and difficult. Are the kids really learning? Are the activities on an appropriate level for each student? How can you tell without grading fifteen different types of activities?

I replaced math centers in my classroom with a 10-minute daily partner game time, and it’s one of the most powerful strategies I’ve found for getting kids to construct knowledge and think deeply about math concepts.

How is a differentiated math partner game time different from math centers?

Kids can pair up and play a game with a partner in either setup. But usually, when students are in centers, you the teacher are working with a small group. Since you’re busy teaching, it’s hard to tell whether the rest of the class is actually learning anything in their centers or if they’ve just mastered the art of looking busy.

During math partner games, however, you are not responsible for small group instruction, so you’re free to facilitate students’ thinking and engage kids in conversations about what they’re learning.

An alternative to differentiated math centers that’s easier, faster, AND more effective

What makes a differentiated math partner game time so beneficial?

Having the whole class play the same game at the same time allows you to conduct mini-lessons/strategy discussions around shared experiences before and after gameplay.

And because the whole class is playing the same game at the same time, you can be 100% focused on observing your students during play and pushing their thinking. You get to watch and engage with students as they actively construct knowledge through collaborative hands-on activities.

How do I make time for differentiated math partner games?

A whole class partner game time can be completed in less than half the time that centers or workstations usually take. It’s a great way to break up long periods of direct instruction with guided practice and meaningful opportunities for students to explore and talk about math concepts.

In my 90-minute math block, for example, I was required to do standardized test prep/spiraling review practice with the kids for 20 minutes at the start of the math period. I chose to follow that with 10 minutes for math partner games, and then launched into my math concept/skill lesson for the day. The active, hands-on partner games were the perfect way to clear students’ heads and let them have some fun.

How many times do kids play the same game?

Generally, students play the same game for an entire week so you have lots of targeted opportunities for identifying and addressing misconceptions and scaffolding student learning.

The repetition also gives students time to master the rules of the game–and that’s where the magic happens. Once kids understand the basics of how to play, they really start focusing on the targeted math skills, determining patterns and strategies, and engaging in higher-level thinking during the discussions.

A good math partner game is open-ended and allows kids to construct their own knowledge. This example is from my Geometry unit.

A good math partner game is open-ended and allows kids to construct their own knowledge. This example is from my Geometry unit.
A good math partner game is open-ended and allows kids to construct their own knowledge. This example is from my Geometry unit.

How are kids paired up?

I recommend that math game partners be selected by the teacher (rather than self-selected) so that students are paired homogeneously. This is important because if you have heterogeneous pairs (mixed ability levels), the less advanced child will lose frequently and get frustrated. Kids are just like we are as adults–it’s only fun to play a game if you regularly experience success and feel like you have a fair shot at winning.

Partner 1 is responsible for getting all the game materials from the front of the room, and Partner 2 is responsible for returning them after game play. I usually set a timer for one minute and teach kids to have everything in its place and be ready to work when the timer goes off. This routine makes set up and clean up super quick.

Partner 1 is responsible for getting all the game materials from the front of the room, and Partner 2 is responsible for returning them after game play. I usually set a timer for one minute and teach kids to have everything in its place and be ready to work when the timer goes off. This routine makes set up and clean up super quick.
Partner 1 is responsible for getting all the game materials from the front of the room, and Partner 2 is responsible for returning them after game play. I usually set a timer for one minute and teach kids to have everything in its place and be ready to work when the timer goes off. This routine makes set up and clean up super quick.

This list of partners is always displayed for the kids’ reference. I make changes to the partner list based on my observations and student input. I’ve found that some kids want to keep the same partner for months, but most kids want to change partners every few weeks, and I try to accommodate them either way so they enjoy the games more.

Is it really differentiated practice if all the kids are playing the same game?

Yes! Differentiation is another reason why I think it’s better to pair kids with similar ability levels for math partner games. You’ll be able to spend more time supporting your struggling students since they’ll be working together. And having your highest-performing kids paired together will be extremely valuable for them because they can play quickly and enjoy being challenged in a way that doesn’t always happen during mixed-ability cooperative activities.

I often differentiate the materials I give each pair of students. For example, below-grade-level students might use a 6 sided number cube (die) during game play, while above-grade-level students might use a 12 or 24 sided cube and play the same game with higher numbers.

I also include a challenge activity in each game which I assign to certain pairs of students for differentiation. Other pairs can choose to do the challenge if they have time, and usually by the last two or three days of the week, most students are ready to try the challenge unless they haven’t yet shown proficiency with the basic level of game play.

Additionally, I include “Math Talk” questions with my games and have students reflect in a conversation or via their math journals. These are open-ended questions that are naturally differentiated.

I like to laminate the materials so students can use them with dry erase markers–it’s more fun for them, and means less photocopying for me.
I like to laminate the materials so students can use them with dry erase markers–it’s more fun for them, and means less photocopying for me.

How do I introduce a differentiated math partner game to my class?

This is where math partner games and center time may differ: you as teacher MUST model how to play the game FIRST.

While it’s tempting to skip the demonstration, it makes a HUGE difference in the quality of strategical thinking and conversations you’ll get from your students.

Use the partner games to model mathematical thinking/reasoning and draw attention to the math strategies you want students to use.

Introduce one game to your students each week. During the modeling, you can demonstrate the basics of the game by playing against a student volunteer.  I use a document camera to help with this, so the class can see the game pieces as we play. I then ask two other student volunteers to play the game for a couple of minutes in front of the class.

Right after the modeling/demonstration, release students to try playing the game with their partners. If you see a lot of kids making the same mistakes or demonstrating major misconceptions, end the game play time a little early. Talk about it afterward, and do more modeling the next day.

When you first introduce a game at the beginning of the week, you’ll start your math partner game time with around 5 minutes of modeling. By mid-week, you can start the time with a mini lesson focusing on the higher-order thinking skills you want students to develop.

What am I as the teacher doing during game play?

In just this one 10 minute time period, you can accomplish so many different things:

  • Observe students as they actively construct knowledge
  • Take anecdotal notes and/or informally assess children in meaningful contexts
  • Model logistical thinking and encourage math talk before, during, and after game play
  • Reinforce basic concept knowledge through game play with below-grade-level students
  • Support students who struggle with cooperative learning and social problem solving skills
  • Challenge high-achievers and push their thinking

How do I give closure and assess the math partner game time?

You can end the math partner game time with a whole-class debriefing session that can go pretty in-depth since all the kids were practicing the same skills through the same game and have shared experiences.

Students can talk about what strategies worked well and which didn’t. Students can also reflect on these questions in writing (i.e. in math journals), or by talking with their partner (or with a different partner in a think-pair-share activity.)

You can pose particular scenarios that might arise during game play and have students suggest strategies for solving them, or mention a challenge that one team of students experienced and have students talk about what they would do.

How do I make my own differentiated math partner games?

I’ve created the FREE cards below which you can use to start creating your own games:

An alternative to differentiated math centers that’s easier, faster, AND more effective

These cards are perfect for all kinds of open-ended, differentiated partner games.

What if I don’t have time to make high quality math partner games?

YOU don’t need to spend hours planning out and designing rigorous math games that cover all the standards–I’ve already done the work for you!

I’ve created ready-to-use math partner games for every Common Core domain (except Measurement and Data) for grades 1-5. These games allow students to practice ALL the standards in multiple ways to ensure they truly master the concepts. Even if your school doesn’t use the CCSS, these games still cover the basic skills and concepts that are taught at the elementary level, and you’ll see the alignment very easily.

The games are $1 each, and are bundled according to skill: Fractions, Geometry, Operations and Algebraic Thinking, and Number and Operations in Base Ten (Place Value).

Each bundle of games features:

  • Higher-level thinking and critical thinking skills (not just rote practice)
  • Hands-on activities which allow kids to actively construct knowledge: no worksheets!
  • Options for open-ended game play so that students are not “finished” until time is up
  • Challenge activities to extend game play and/or differentiate it
  • Math Talk questions/prompts to encourage students to analyze strategies and reflect orally or in writing about what they’re learning

Click through the slideshow to see the games for each domain and grade level, or click here to view them in my store:

An alternative to differentiated math centers that’s easier, faster, AND more effective

Already purchased the games? Get the updates free! You now get a .zip folder with purchase that includes individual PDFs for each game. If you only want to print and use one game at a time, you can easily print just the PDF with that game’s instructions and materials. Go into your TeachersPayTeachers account and view your purchases, then re-download the games to access the update.

How do these game work in real classrooms?

These games have been used and loved in thousands of classrooms around the world! Here’s what other teachers are saying:

These games have really enhanced my students’ understanding of place value. They have thoroughly enjoyed playing them. Instructions are clear and games are easy to make. Thanks! – Cathy H.

Best games ever. My 5th graders finally understood fractions after playing these thank you!!!!!! – The Whimsical Teacher

My students don’t even realize they’re learning while they are playing games! Thank you! – Ally Blackwell

This is terrific! I really like all of your information at the beginning for how you use these games for instructional purposes with the gradual release model. Thanks! – Jania D.

The game sets are easy to put together and no-nonsense. The students have enjoyed playing the games, and they play even during “indoor” recesses.  – Anonymous Buyer

Definitely worth it so I can spend more of my Christmas break with my family. Saved me a ton of prep time. Thanks! – Zephyr

Great games! Very engaging! Makes practicing these skills a lot more enjoyable for my struggling students – Britta B.

I love how all these games can be played over and over again rather than just once and the question are rigorous. – Katelynn T.

Wonderful games that kept my student engaged for long periods of time with challenging problem solving and critical thinking skills. – Tracy N.

My students love these games, so often I hear, “Math is fun!” Can’t get better than that! – Anonymous Buyer

Fun, creative and interactive, with lots of use of math vocabulary for the students. – Anonymous Buyer

So helpful to have these games to reinforce and differentiate groups! Thank you! – Dayna D.

This sounds great, but isn’t it too late in the year to start partner games?

Nope–this is actually the perfect time to introduce something fun and new to your students. They’ve already (mostly) gotten the hang of your regular classroom routines and are ready for a different challenge. Differentiated math partner games are a great way to break up the monotony of your regular math lessons.

Plus, kids LOVE to play these games! If you have students that dislike math or struggle with it so much that they rarely get any enjoyment from their assignments, these games will allow them to experience success and see the creative, open-ended, and enjoyable aspects of math concepts…maybe for the very first time.

For me, student engagement is at an all-time high when kids are playing differentiated partner games–that 10 minute block might be the highlight of the day for your students!

Have you tried differentiated math partner games in your classroom? Share your questions and experiences in the comments below–I’d love to help!

Angela Watson

Founder and Writer

Angela is a National Board Certified educator with 11 years of teaching experience and more than a decade of experience as an instructional coach. She started this website in 2003, and now serves as Editor-in-Chief of the Truth for Teachers...
Browse Articles by Angela

Sign up to get new Truth for Teachers articles in your inbox

Discussion


  1. I would love to try these! However, I teach Kindergarten. Is there anything I can use? Some are still identifying their numbers.

    1. Hi, Jen! The 1st grade games I made would probably be too rigorous at this point in the year for your kindies. I wonder if you could use the same math partner game process using simpler games your students already know how to play using tens frames and such?

  2. How do you handle an odd number of students? Or even an odd number of students at a level- I have five second graders below our bench mark level…it makes partner work rather challenging! I welcome all suggestions…these activities seem like fun!

    1. I find that there’s almost always one student absent or out of the room, so it’s rare that everyone partners up exactly the way they’re so supposed to. Before we start the partner game time, I ask students to all look at the partner list and raise their hand if they don’t see their partner in the room. I then just match up the kids whose hands are raised and don’t have partners. Every now and then, there would be an odd number of students, and I’d either play with that child myself or let him/her be the scorekeeper for a partnership of his or her choice (that was always a super fun option.)

  3. I have done partner math games in previous years of teaching and had great success with scaffolding and supporting students while they play with partners who are within their ZPD. I am curious, though, about when you might run a small math group for those kiddos who need consistent extra support. I feel like my second grade class this year is a class where I have many below-level kiddos who require direct instruction in small group, and so I am using math centers this year instead of partner games so that I can spend appropriate time with those children. In addition, my school requires us to document our small group time for our child study process, and the children I am working with in small group are the kiddos on child study. Do you have any suggestions? Thanks in advance!

    1. Great question! I’ve done this a couple of different ways over the years, depending on the kids’ needs:

      -Sometimes I continued to do small group rotations, with 3 different activities (instruction with me, independent practice, and practice on the computer.)

      -Sometimes I had the whole class in independent/collaborative practice (I mixed it up) and pulled small groups as needed. So if they had a 30 minute activity, I’d pull the below grade level kids for 10, the on grade level for 10, and the above for 10, and then’d just return to their practice when done.

      -Sometimes I didn’t have any formal “groups” at all, and allowed kids to take charge of their learning. So, I’d do a math mini-lesson with all the kids on the carpet, and then release students to go practice at their desks, saying that if there was anyone who would like to complete the practice activity together with me to get a little more help, they could stay on the rug. The kids could then decide if they were ready to go off on their own or stay. Generally around 10 kids would choose to stay with me–they viewed it as a fun thing, especially since I had them practicing the work on individual dry erase boards.

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion? Feel free to contribute!